Mel over at Stirrup Queens
posted recently about a new site called Modamily & it really rubbed me the
wrong way…not Mel’s post but this new site. Admittedly, I haven’t followed any
of the links she provided so I am writing this solely based on the quotes in
her post.
I am not against the concept of
the site. Basically, it’s a social network matching site bringing people
together who want to co-parent as opposed to using an anonymous donor etc. I
believe it’s a fabulous option that could work for many people.
What I take exception to is
this: (copied from Mel’s post who copied it from the site)
“In most cases, when using a sperm donor, a mother is resigned to being a single parent. We feel that co-parenting provides more support to the child because it involves two parents that are physically, financially, and emotionally committed. Healthy, happy, and balanced children are what we are trying to achieve and statistically, having both a mother and father within a child’s life dramatically improves chances for a happy and balanced upbringing.”
I found this offensive on so many
levels. Firstly, I am not, nor ever have been, resigned to be a single
mother, hence the choice part of Single Mom by Choice. I am beyond grateful to
live in an era, society, culture that allows me this choice as an option. I
have had many feelings throughout this process; resignation was never
one of them.
Secondly, I find it hard to
accept that I could have more support from a co-parenting
situation, at least the type this site promotes, than I do now. I guess essentially
I am co-parenting Elena with my Mom since we live in the same household &
my Mom will be caring for Elena while I work. On top of that support, I have
numerous family & friends who are more than willing to look after Elena if
I need. And if we’re talking emotional support (for me or Elena), again I don’t
see how their situation is any more supportive than the one I’m in.
Which brings me to thirdly, I
am thoroughly offended at the implication made that my daughter will be a less
healthy, happy & balanced child based on my choice. I would never judge
anyone for the choices they make so am extremely insulted by the judgment implied
here. I don’t know how my daughter could be more loved or cherished by myself
or the people who surround & support us. Elena has her fair share of male
influence & a deep commitment from me & my family to ensure she never
feels lacking by not having a father.
Lastly, I resent the
implication that my choice is a consolation prize. “Poor Tiara, she wasn’t good
enough to snag a husband so had to resort to sperm donation.” Admittedly this
wasn’t how I expected my life to turn out, not because Choice Motherhood is a
second choice, but because it wasn’t an option I was ever aware of before a few
years ago. I, like many of my generation, grew up with the notion that you have
to meet Mr. Right (or Mr. Good Enough) in order to get married & have children.
So I spent copious amounts of my time, effort, emotions, meeting men, developing
relationships & working hard to make relationships work that were destined
to fail, all for the deep desire to have children & be a mother. If someone
had sat me down when I was eighteen years old & said, “Look Tiara, there
are more ways to become a mother than getting married.” If I had been made
aware of the options that would be available to me, I don’t believe I would
have devoted my twenties to trying to find Mr. Right. I don’t believe I would
have spent the first part of my thirties in such a deep depression, convincing
myself I must be worthless & unlovable because I hadn’t been able meet Mr.
Right.
When I choose Single
Motherhood, I didn’t give up on love. I took the desperation out of meeting Mr.
Right. I finally learned that one wasn’t dependant on the other & I could
be a mother, fulfill that dream & still hold hope that I’ll meet a life
partner someday. The most important part of this lesson I learned? Before, I
believed my happiness & the completeness of my life was contingent on this elusive
Mr. Right. I now know that my happiness solely rests in my hands & becoming
a mother has made me feel complete.
The fact that this site diminishes
my choices to promote their own is why it completely loses credibility with me.
Which is sad since I think the option of co-parenting is a great alternative that
many could benefit from.
There are many other issues
that come up regarding this site, so please, if you haven’t already, click over to Mel’s post. She is far more eloquent that me.
Uhm, yeah, they are full of crap. They are putting going down the single mom-sperm bank route because they want to promote themselves, its like a political attack ad, don't vote for the other party because they suck, vote for ME. Thinking about it that way is the only way I'm refraining from getting majorly pissed off.
ReplyDeleteIf all really goes well, then I'd say yeah, the modafamily's route is better than being a single mom, because you give your child 2 parents instead of one. But when on earth do all things go well? Probably for maybe 1-2 out of 10 couples reproducing in this way.
2 strangers are likely to fight when they become roomates. When they decide to have a KID together? Two people who fall in love and get married and then decide its not working out can savage their child in a custody battle-- I shudder to think what two strangers who have never been in love with each other may decide to do when the co-parenting experiment fails. Its likely to get seriously ugly, I pity anybody stupid enough to do this without an ironclad legal contract first.
I agree, I resent the implication that one parent homes (by choice) are somehow "less than". I decided against the co-parenting route because I felt like it could get very messy and traumatic for the child - I mean, this other person is bound to be in and out of relationships, have all kinds of life challenges over an 18 year period, decide to move, change jobs, etc. I'm sure there are plenty of happy co-parenting situations out there, but plenty that didn't exactly go the way the mother expected, either. There is zero research to support the statement that two-parented children are ALWAYS happier and more well-adjusted than single-parented children (unless the single-parented children in the study are below the poverty level and born to teenaged mothers, which is almost always the case in these "studies"). So, yeah, I feel your outrage.
ReplyDeleteBravo!! Applause! Applause!
ReplyDeleteYou said it pretty eloquently to me!
You hit the nail on the head and I can't speak for all SMC but for me you are dead on!
Thank you for this post.
Those idiots at that website need to read this!
As far as I can see, that site is a disaster waiting to happen. Also from what I saw, I think I'll stick to my donor.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you. I'll stick with being a SMC.. and I am sure I can raise a healthy, happy, stable child!!! Thanks for your post.
ReplyDeleteTime is limited so I'll make this short, but I agree with you completely. I couldn't be happier with my decision to become a choice mom. I was talking to a fellow choice mom the other day and we both remarked how happy our babies are. Maybe because they are not around parents arguing over issues (including how to parent) they are happier children (at least before they hit their teen years and need to hate us for something so they choose the fact that there is no father). I really enjoyed how perfectly you expressed yourself here.
ReplyDeleteThis is it exactly: "The fact that this site diminishes my choices to promote their own."
ReplyDeleteResigned is never a word I'd use to describe any SMC I know. Empowered, sure. Tired, happy, self-assured. But not resigned.
That paragraph you wrote about your twenties/early thirties? I could have written that!
ReplyDeleteI agree they missed the true concept of "choice" when they wrote about SMC's who use donors to create their families. And they certainly have missed observing the healthy families headed by single women that I've had to the honor to know.
I love this post - no time to give it the comment it deserves, but I LOVE it. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteWell well said! I totally agree with what you have written.
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
ReplyDeleteI think there are studies that show that our children are healthy, happy and balanced. What is important is not how many parents a child has, but the fact that he is loved. We SMCs go through quite a lot to have our children, and we sure love them :-).
There are advantages to shared parenting, but I am more than happy thatt I have my little girl all to my self :-).
P.S
I see on the ticker that Elena has just had her first birthday. I am sure you have a bithhday post and all, but since I am so behind on my blog reading and I don't know when I'll get to it, I will say here and now HAPPY HAPPY BIRTHDAY DEAR ELENA!!
"I finally learned that one wasn’t dependant on the other & I could be a mother, fulfill that dream & still hold hope that I’ll meet a life partner someday." PREACH. Fulfilling one dream doesn't mean that the others won't come true. Elena is beautiful!
ReplyDeleteI remember Mel's post and it too raised my hackles (not Mel's post, but the new site). I'm of the opinion that a child can and will be happy and well adjusted if raised in a loving home, regardless of how many parents are in it. Great post!
ReplyDeleteSo empowered: "When I choose Single Motherhood, I didn’t give up on love. I took the desperation out of meeting Mr. Right."
ReplyDeleteWell said, Tiara.
Here from CdlC - bravo! Great post!
ReplyDeleteBeautiful post! I hate it when parenting choices get distorted into judgements. You have captured that so well in these wonderful words.
ReplyDeleteBeautiful post! I hate it when parenting choices get distorted into judgements. You have captured that so well in these wonderful words.
ReplyDeleteHere from Creme. Great post. You are able to really zoom in on the ridiculous assumptions present in their argument.
ReplyDeleteI loved what you said about taking the desperation out of meeting Mr. Right. How many women (and men too, I suppose) have "settled" because they want to have a child and they feel the pressure? Probably a lot. Good for you for speaking up about a cause that's close to your heart!
ReplyDeleteI am going to go a step further and say that I believe our decision is better than co-parenting. While I haven't looked at the site, to me it seems that co-parenting is like joint custody. I think that concept is hard on children (my parents divorced and I went through their co-parenting). I think one stable home with however many caregivers, whatever genders, and however related to the child is best.
ReplyDeleteSomeday people will realize that family function is way more important than family structure. And that the children of single mothers (especially by choice) are not destined for terrible childhoods. The reason single mothers do so poorly in the statistical research is more related to the poverty they tend to live in when trying to support a family alone than their singleness. Perhaps we could better invest our energy as a society in allowing women (and everyone else) to earn wages on which they can provide for their families.